David E. Rapoport Receives AV Preeminent Rating: Highest Possible Professional Rating
January 2, 2012
We are pleased to announce that in 2012 Rapoport Weisberg & Sims P.C.’s founding partner, attorney David E. Rapoport, will mark his 20th anniversary year of receiving the highest possible professional rating,* AV Preeminent, from Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings.
AV Preeminent* is a significant rating accomplishment – a testament to the fact that a lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence, and an objective indicator of a lawyer’s high ethical standards and professional ability, generated from evaluations of lawyers, by other members of the bar and the judiciary in the United States and Canada.
As a plaintiff’s personal injury lawyer, Mr. Rapoport demonstrates tireless dedication to obtaining justice for people who have been seriously injured and the loved ones of those wrongfully killed, and is proud to obtain this 20th anniversary distinction.
Click here to learn more about David Rapoport.
Rapoport Weisberg & Sims P.C. is a personal injury law firm based in Chicago, Illinois. The personal injury attorneys at Rapoport Weisberg & Sims P.C. have achieved multimillion-dollar verdicts and settlements for individuals with lawsuits arising from medical malpractice, product liability, semitruck and motor vehicle accident, workplace injuries and construction accident in Illinois and Wisconsin. Rapoport Weisberg & Sims P.C.’s premier aviation negligence lawyers represent victims of commercial and general aviation disasters nationwide.
If you feel you may be in need of legal services, personally email an attorney from Rapoport Weisberg & Sims P.C. for a free case evaluation or telephone our Chicago office toll free at 800-545-6437.
*AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards.