Lawmakers: Why Did GM Not Heed Complaints over Deadly Defects?
Legislators want to know why General Motors declined to fix deadly auto defects that were allowed to go to market for a decade. So far, an ongoing investigation has linked 13 deaths to defective ignition switches in a variety of GM models.
The problem with 1.6 million recalled cars is that their electrical systems and engines can be easily turned off if the ignition switch is shaken or if the keys are heavy. Turning off the electrical systems disables the air bags, posing a serious risk of injury and death.
According to GM officials, all of the known fatal accidents linked to the defective part happened before 2010. GM's business structure prior to emerging from a 2009 bankruptcy was called the Motors Liquidation Company. Plaintiffs in personal injury and wrongful death cases may have to bring claims against Motors Liquidation in order to receive compensation for damages.
GM was reportedly first made aware of the ignition defect in 2004. However, the company twice declined to fix the problem. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has meanwhile received at least 260 complaints about GM vehicles unexpectedly turning off. Investigators also want to know why safety regulators decided not to further investigate the deadly defect.
GM claims that 31 crashes have so far been linked to the faulty auto part, and the carmaker has until early April to respond to more than 100 questions about the mishandling of the ignition defects.
If you would like to learn more about legal matters related to product liability, then our personal injury website is a good place to start.
Source: The New York Times, "House to Investigate Slow Response to Fault in G.M. Vehicles," Matthew L. Wald and Bill Vlasic, March 10, 2014
Watch A Quick Video:
*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.
**Board certification is not required to practice law in Illinois, and the Illinois Supreme Court does not recognize specialties in the practice of law.
What Our Clients Say
- Just wanted to take a moment to say thank you. I know a lot of hard work, by all of you, went into the preparation of this case and we wanted you to know that it is greatly appreciated. We worried about many things during that period, but one thing we didn't worry about was our attorneys. What a fine team you make! You guys are great! Read More
- I wanted to touch base with everyone again to express my thanks to everyone involved in the USAir 1016 case for the way the case was handled and the way you treated myself and my family. While I realize that there are other law firms that could have tried the case, I don't believe they could have matched the caring you showed us... Read More
- How do we thank you for doing such a tremendous job with the lawsuit against Freeport Memorial Hospital?...The day that check arrived I was so nervous, in fact I was a wreck until we had it safely invested. I am not thanking you just as our attorney, but as a very good friend...Read More
- We would like to take this opportunity to express our heartfelt thanks for the supportive service that you have given our family during the past three years. While we wish that we would not have found ourselves in a situation requiring your services, we are grateful for the sensitive way...Read More
Email Us For a Response
Have Questions? We Have Answers.
Tell us about your case and we’ll get back to you with a FREE case evaluation.
Bold labels are required.
Premier Personal Injury & Wrongful Death Attorneys
Call 877-216-4213 or Email Us For A Free Initial Consultation