Justice Starts Here

Premier Personal Injury & Wrongful Death Attorneys

Free Consultations | Se Habla Español
Rapoport, Weisberg & Sims P.C.

Trucking Industry Objects to Proposed Cell Phone Restrictions on Truck Drivers

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, nearly 60,000 people were injured and 3,380 people were killed in truck crashes in 2009. Many of these deaths and injuries were caused by distracted truck drivers using cell phones.

"Every time a commercial truck or bus driver takes his or her eyes off the road to use a cell phone, even for a few seconds, the driver places everyone around them at risk," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. Therefore, in order to keep drivers safe, the D.O.T. has proposed new federal rules banning cell phone use by truck drivers.

After announcing a federal ban on texting for commercial truck drivers in January, the D.O.T. is currently proposing federal rules prohibiting a commercial truck driver from reaching for, holding, or dialing a cell phone while driving. In support of the proposed rule, the D.O.T. cites statistics showing the odds of being involved in a safety-critical event are three times greater when a driver is reaching for an object and six times greater while a driver is dialing a cell phone. "Implementation of this proposal would help make our roads safer and target a leading cause of distracted driving," said Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator Anne S. Ferro.

The trucking industry has responded by objecting and seeking to water down this proposed ban on cell phone use.

For instance, the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. (OOIDA), a trucking association with over 150,000 members, submitted a written response to the proposed rulemaking last week stating the proposed restrictions on cell phone use by truck drivers are "unwarranted and unfair," and complaining that the "proposal treats the use of a hand-held cell phone as a serious traffic violation punishable by harsh sanctions that are disproportionate to the nature of the offense."

OOIDA's resistance to the D.O.T.'s common sense proposal aimed at reducing needless deaths and injuries caused by distracted truck drivers is disturbing. Considering that nine states and the District of Columbia have laws banning all drivers from using cell phones while driving, the D.O.T.'s proposal to ban drivers of the most dangerous vehicles on the roadway from using cell phones hardly seems "unwarranted and unfair," rather it seem overdue. And when OOIDA complains that the proposed penalties are disproportionate to the nature of the offense, is it considering the number of needless deaths and injuries that have resulted from this offense?

Meanwhile, the American Trucking Association (ATA) also submitted a written response to the proposed rulemaking, claiming that it supports restrictions on cell phone use by truck drivers, but seeking to water down the rules. For example, ATA argues that reaching for cell phones while driving should be allowed, and drivers should be allowed to make calls while driving as long as they only have to press "a limited number of buttons (e.g. three or fewer)" in order to initiate a call.

In addition to ATA's "limited number of buttons" proposal being virtually impossible to enforce, it completely misses the point. Semi-tractor-trailers are extremely dangerous to others on the roadway due to their massive size, weight, and sometimes because of the nature of their cargo. While reaching for or dialing a phone may only take a few seconds, many crashes have been caused and many lives have been destroyed by truck drivers who were distracted for just a few seconds. Would you want to be traveling with your family on the highway and have a semi-truck driver on his cell phone behind you? Of course not - the very thought is terrifying.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Jury Verdicts &

$6.4 Million Settlement Medical Malpractice

More Verdicts & Settlements
  • National board of trial academy
  • ABPLA | American Board of Professional Liability Attorneys
  • AV preeminent | Peer rated for highest level of professional excellence 2018
  • The best lawyer in America
  • Super Lawyers
  • America's top 100 high stakes litigators
  • The national trial lawyers top 100 trial lawyers
  • Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb Top rated personal injury
  • American association for justice president's club
  • American association for justice Leaders forum
  • ACBCA American College of Board Certified Attorneys
  • B Injury Board
  • Recommended by peers for leading lawyers network the top lawyers
  • Best lawyers Best Law Firms | U.S.News | 2019
  • The national trial lawyers top 40 under 40
  • The national trial lawyers top 10

*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.

**Board certification is not required to practice law in Illinois, and the Illinois Supreme Court does not recognize specialties in the practice of law.

What Our Clients Say

  • Just wanted to take a moment to say thank you. I know a lot of hard work, by all of you, went into the preparation of this case and we wanted you to know that it is greatly appreciated. We worried about many things during that period, but one thing we didn't worry about was our attorneys. What a fine team you make! You guys are great! Read More
  • I wanted to touch base with everyone again to express my thanks to everyone involved in the USAir 1016 case for the way the case was handled and the way you treated myself and my family. While I realize that there are other law firms that could have tried the case, I don't believe they could have matched the caring you showed us... Read More
  • How do we thank you for doing such a tremendous job with the lawsuit against Freeport Memorial Hospital?...The day that check arrived I was so nervous, in fact I was a wreck until we had it safely invested. I am not thanking you just as our attorney, but as a very good friend...Read More
  • We would like to take this opportunity to express our heartfelt thanks for the supportive service that you have given our family during the past three years. While we wish that we would not have found ourselves in a situation requiring your services, we are grateful for the sensitive way...Read More
Email Us For a Response

Have Questions? We Have Answers.

Tell us about your case and we’ll get back to you with a FREE case evaluation.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Premier Personal Injury & Wrongful Death Attorneys

Call 877-216-4213 or Email Us For A Free Initial Consultation

 Rapoport Weisberg & Sims P.C. Review Us

Office Location

20 North Clark Street
Suite 3500
Chicago, IL 60602

Toll Free: 877-216-4213
Phone: 312-445-9160
Chicago Law Office Map

Contact Information